stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed May 11 14:06:13 UTC 2011
On 5/11/11 7:57 AM, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
> On May 11, 2011, at 07:46 , Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 5/10/11 6:13 AM, Ralph Meijer wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:18 +0100, Kevin Smith wrote:
>>>> 4) Update XEP-0178 (Best Practices for Use of SASL EXTERNAL with
>>>> Certificates) with the interim version 1.1rc5
>>>> Everyone to vote onlist by 11th May (a fortnight).
>> Ralph's is the only position I've seen expressed on XEP-0178. Anyone else?
> * Example #8 in Section 2 and example #8 in section 3 have <required/> as a child of <mechanisms xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl'/>, which would violate the schema defined in RFC 6120
Good catch. Fixed in my working copy.
> * For exactly what error to respond with, I'd rather it be SHOULDs rather than MUSTs, but not strongly enough to object
I'll check them all for consistency with RFC 6120.
> Otherwise, I'm +1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Council