[Council] deferred => retracted
kevin at kismith.co.uk
Mon Sep 17 18:43:28 UTC 2012
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> I'd like to change XEP-0281 (which I authored) from Deferred to
> Retracted (since I now favor the approach in XEP-0289). Strictly
> speaking that path is not in the state chart:
> I suppose I could make it experimental and then retracted, but that
> seems like too much bother. ;-)
> Any Council opinions?
I don't have any problem with slightly bending the state chart in this
way - it's only a short circuit across you publishing a meaningless
update, rather than an abuse of procedure.
More information about the Council