[Council] Minutes 2013-03-20

[Tobias Markmann]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Smith <kevin at kismith.co.uk> wrote:

> Minutes for Council meeting 2013-03-20.
> Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/130320/
>
> 1) Roll call
> Kev, Matt, Matt and Ralph present, Tobias absent.
>

Yeah..


>
> 2) Issue Last Call on XEP-0220: Server Dialback?
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0220.html
>
> Kev, Matt, Matt and Ralph in favour, Tobias has a fortnight to object.
>

+1


>
> 3) Advance XEP-0308: Message Correction to Draft?
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0308.html
>
> Kev, Matt, Matt and Ralph +1, Tobias to vote within a fortnight.
>

+1 for advancing.


>
> 4) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dtls-fingerprint.html
> Accept as Experimental?
>
> No objections from those present, Tobias has a fortnight to object.
>

No objections from me.


>
> 5) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/roster-management.html
> Accept as Experimental?
>
> No objections from those present, Tobias has a fortnight to object.
>

I'm okay with accepting it as experimental.


>
> 6) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sensor-data.html
> Accept as Experimental?
>
> No objections from Matt, Matt, Ralph. Kev and Tobias have a fortnight to
> object.
>

No larger objections..just some recommendations I'd like to see applied
after it being accepted as experimental:
 - Formal
- Images should probably be SVG or Base64ed PNG inside the XML
- Glossary could use definition list markup instead of table
 - Technical
- Time format is encoded like XEP-0082. A reference to it would be nice.

 7) http://xmpp.org/extensions/i <http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/exi.html>
> exi <http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/exi.html>
> nbox/.html <http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/exi.html>
> Accept as experimental
>
> Much discussion during the meeting - see the room logs.
>
> Main points of contention were whether attacks were possible by doing
> schema exchange pre-auth and whether it fits the 138 model or should
> be a new transport binding.
>
> Matt Wild didn't object, others have a fortnight to object.
>

I think it should use XEP-300 for the schema hashes and not advertise use
of MD5, especially if there's no specific reasoning for it described. Other
than that I have no objections accepting it as experimental XEP.

Cheers,
Tobi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20130325/c8d46008/attachment.html>