[Council] Veto against namespaces protoXEP

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Wed Apr 22 16:42:49 UTC 2015

There is some possibility that XEP-0001 might be interpreted such that my
protoXEP would go through by default; for the avoidance of doubt I'm
therefore placing a veto on this until (at least) the next Council meeting.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20150422/af2dce59/attachment.html>

More information about the Council mailing list