[Council] Council Meeting Minutes for 2017-03-08

Kevin Smith kevin.smith at isode.com
Thu Mar 9 13:21:43 UTC 2017

On 9 Mar 2017, at 13:04, Daniel Gultsch <daniel at gultsch.de> wrote:
> 2017-03-09 12:58 GMT+01:00 Tobias Markmann <tmarkmann at googlemail.com>:
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Daniel Gultsch <daniel at gultsch.de> wrote:
>>> Daniel notes that by delegating responsibly to the individual XEP’s
>>> you are forcing those XEP’s to do a Namespace bump to clarify that
>>> behaviour while he believes that the behaviour wasn’t necessarily
>>> unclear before.
>> If the behaviour currently isn't unclear, I don't see why rewording or more
>> clearly describe the current behaviour would cause a namespace bump.
> My interpretation of things is that everything that has been enabled
> in a stream (carbons, blocking command subscription, CSI and so forth)
> will remained enabled after that stream has been resumed. Why wouldn't
> it?

I think that’s right. It’s not unclear what the stream state is after resumption, it’s resumed after all. The issue is simply whether an entity can know what the stream state is after resumption if an ack isn’t received due the the state change not being a consequence of a stanza.


More information about the Council mailing list