[Council] Splitting MIX

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Tue May 15 15:10:17 UTC 2018

So I think:

1) Splitting a XEP into multiple XEPs without changing the technical
content can be seen as an Editorial change.

2) Technical changes to the XEPs, once split, are covered under the usual

3) Doing both at the same time is a grey area; good practise suggests that
introducing technical change during the split would be hard for people to
review, though.

On 11 May 2018 at 12:08, Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:

> Steve and I are looking at splitting up MIX at some point in the future.
> In the past it’s happened that when an already-accepted spec has been split
> into multiple that the Editor’s just published the ‘new’ XEPs without
> Council voting, as Council’s already accepted the content. Does anyone have
> any objections if we follow that principle here, or would Council like to
> go through voting processes for each split?
> /K
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20180515/35c8ae1e/attachment.html>

More information about the Council mailing list