[JDEV] Namespace usage on server

temas temas at box5.net
Wed Oct 3 14:16:22 CDT 2001


Yeah, that's probably not cool currently, and I don't know how to
quickly fix all the servers installed.  With the next gen work it can
probably be taken care of to understand the namespacing better.  Jer,
any thoughts on potential fixes for the current system?

--temas


On Wed, 2001-10-03 at 11:59, Fabrice DESRE - FT.BD/FTRD/DMI/GRI wrote:
> temas wrote:
> > 
> > Diz is right, we just need to make our parser in the next gen reference
> > implementation (and possibly a patch for 1.4.x) to fully understand
> > namespaces.  The rest of this thread seems like a bit of
> > miscommunication or crossed wires.  Let's fix this rather than argue
> > over it, we've identitified the problem.
> 
>  I think that more than a namespace conformance issue, this can
> potentially
> raise a design issue - I'm referring here to the default namespace
> declaration
> in <stream:stream/> being used as a way to identify the class of the
> stream.
> Perhaps using a different stream namespace for each case could solve
> this
> problem in more efficient and conform way.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Fabrice
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jdev/attachments/20011003/c0c51973/attachment-0002.pgp>


More information about the JDev mailing list