[jdev] Re: Re: Subscription removal during global comm. block
vinod.p at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 23:16:02 CST 2005
On 12/8/05, Remko Troncon <remko at psi-im.org> wrote:
> > Even if (un)subscription requests are sent as <presence/> stanzas, they
> > are never blocked by the privacy lists.
> How about item 4 of 10.2:
> Privacy lists MUST be the first delivery rule applied by a
> server, superseding (1) the routing and delivery rules specified
> in Server Rules for Handling XML Stanzas (Section 11), and (2)
> the handling of subscription-related presence stanzas (and
> corresponding generation of roster pushes) specified in
> Integration of Roster Items and Presence Subscriptions (Section
This is exactly the basis of my question. If item 4 is followed for
unsubscription, then the magnitude of inconsistencies become greater.
> > They are handled even if presences of that entity would get blocked.
> That's what i thought :-)
As implementors, we'd like the least number of inconsistencies. But
we also have to adhere to specs. So better that these things get
More information about the JDev