[jdev] Re: S2S and SASL
scm at marquard.net
Tue Jul 26 13:26:22 CDT 2005
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> - If SASL should happen for each individual s2s connection, should
>> bi-directional communications be deferred until SASL is successfully
>> completed over each connection as is required for Server Dialback?
> I think exchange of XML stanzas should be deferred until SASL is
> successfully completed in both directions.
> But those are merely my opinions.
Why would one want to have 2 unidirectional connections rather than 1
bidirectional connection? Dialback is an authentication mechanism, so if SASL is
in use it would seem to be redundant.
More information about the JDev