[jdev] new-style session request

[Travis Shirk]

On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 09:41 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Travis Shirk wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:24 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > 
> >> Indeed, it's not 100% clear that we need *any* stream re-openings, and
> >> that's something we might want to put into rfc3920bis for improved
> >> efficiency during stream negotiation. Or at least discuss.
> > 
> > I agree that reopening the stream is just syntactic sugar since it
> > really enforces nothing, but maybe a better option would be that the new
> > list of features is sent after each one is negotiated?  
> 
> Well sure, that's how it's supposed to work right now. Is some software
> not doing that?

Against jabber.org... I see no new set of stream:features after the
resource bind or the session start, currently the only two features
which do not require reopening the stream, AFAIK.

-travis