[jdev] new-style session request

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Mar 5 22:38:13 CST 2008


Travis Shirk wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 09:41 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Travis Shirk wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:24 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed, it's not 100% clear that we need *any* stream re-openings, and
>>>> that's something we might want to put into rfc3920bis for improved
>>>> efficiency during stream negotiation. Or at least discuss.
>>> I agree that reopening the stream is just syntactic sugar since it
>>> really enforces nothing, but maybe a better option would be that the new
>>> list of features is sent after each one is negotiated?  
>> Well sure, that's how it's supposed to work right now. Is some software
>> not doing that?
> 
> Against jabber.org... I see no new set of stream:features after the
> resource bind or the session start, currently the only two features
> which do not require reopening the stream, AFAIK.

Er, I meant that the server would return all the features of interest
when it advertises resource binding. Are you suggesting that the server
would return a new set of features after resource binding is completed?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jdev/attachments/20080305/f2ad3845/attachment-0002.bin>


More information about the JDev mailing list