[jdev] The future of Jabber/XMPP?

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Fri Sep 3 08:25:36 CDT 2010

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tomasz Sterna <tomek at xiaoka.com> wrote:
> On czw, 2010-08-26 at 12:35 -0400, Stephen Pendleton wrote:
>> Also, if ejabberd doesn't want to provide proper PEP support then you
>> should just remove it as a listed feature. A missing feature is better
>> than a broken one.
> This may be a design flaw of the JEP/XEP process itself.
> XEPs are not versioned and one cannot say that it implements XEP-xxxx
> v1.1 but not v1.2 which introduced breaking changes.

Yes, this was recognised a while ago, and new XEPs are versioned with
different namespaces for incompatible changes.


More information about the JDev mailing list