[Jingle] OT voting (was: Re: transport fallbacks for stream transports)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Jul 28 09:03:54 CDT 2008

Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Robert McQueen wrote:
>>> The proposal is to remove the "content-replace" action, and instead add
>>> "transport-replace" to replace the transport *only* for an already
>>> accepted content, and "transport-accept" so that the other party can
>>> agree to this change.
>> As discussed at the XMPP Summit, I'm +1 on this change.
> I was neither on the summit nor have I a vote but the content-replace
> also bothered me we implementing jingle-streams. transport-replace
> sounds much better.

FYI, we tend to use "+1" in an informal way to indicate support for an 
idea. In fact only the XMPP Council members have an official vote on 
advancing specifications to Draft/Final/etc., but on this list we're not 
officially voting, just providing our opinions.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/attachments/20080728/ffc01689/attachment.bin 

More information about the Jingle mailing list