[Jingle] updated codecs document

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Sat Apr 4 18:53:06 CDT 2009

On 4/2/09 2:28 PM, Arc Riley wrote:

> In effort of being clear to implementors the royalty status of H.264,
> you may want to expand that this is not just an issue with software
> implementations but commercial usage; anyone using Jingle with H.264 as
> part of a commercial service, including "free" streaming services, may
> need to pay royalties based on the volume of their service. 
> http://www.streamingmedia.com/article.asp?id=10900 goes into much
> greater detail about this, as does
> http://www.mpegla.com/avc/AVC_TermsSummary.pdf in slightly more obscure
> wording.




Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/attachments/20090404/3a7120b6/attachment.bin 

More information about the Jingle mailing list