[Jingle] vote on XEPs 166, 167, 176, and 177

[Peter Saint-Andre]

On 4/3/09 3:44 AM, Paul Witty wrote:
> Just looking through them today.  I'll comment as I spot things.  Firstly:
> 
> XEP-0177: Security considerations.  6.1 seems obsolete now that the
> candidates are exchanged in the session-accept, and no checks are
> performed for the validity of the candidates.

Agreed. I'll fix that. We still need similar text in XEP-0176, though.

Have you found anything else?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/attachments/20090404/7c6bd408/attachment.bin