[Jingle] Typo and possible clarification in XEP 0166

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Sat Apr 18 16:47:15 CDT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4/18/09 3:17 AM, Will Thompson wrote:
> At <http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html#def-action-ties>, the
> example is incorrectly titled “Initiator returns unexpected-request
> error”, while in fact the initiator should return <conflict/> and
> <tie-break/> (as indeed it does in the example.

Fixed, thanks.

> Also, it seems strange that “If the content-remove results in zero
> content definitions for the session, the entity that receives the
> content-remove SHOULD send a session-terminate action to the other party
> (since a session with no content definitions is void).” is relegated to
> a footnote rather than being in the definition of content-remove. It
> seems like an edge-case worth being aware of.

It's no longer in a footnote.

> If I initiate a session with one content, then send a content-add, and
> you remove the first content and reject the second, presumably the same
> applies?

Correct. I've added a sentence about that to the definition of
content-reject.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknqSmMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vy0VgCffgj1ZsBhN6BTPjcgYH04MrUS
gT0AoLdkqnmh2+V/6ZUiivZW46waOZ71
=mZZQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Jingle mailing list