[Jingle] ICE-CONTROLLING / CONTROLLED

[Peter Saint-Andre]

On 12/1/09 10:37 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Tue Dec  1 17:33:58 2009, Justin Karneges wrote:
>> The ICE draft says that conflict resolution is needed for third-party
>> call
>> control cases.  Whenever I see stuff like "third-party call control",
>> my SIP
>> alarms go off, and I don't think it's wrong to ask for clarification
>> about
>> it.
> 
> Sure, but I'm not following the value in deviating from the standard
> spec here. Is this stuff particularly onerous?
> 
>> Appendix B.11 describes a case where a call controller sends out
>> invites to
>> two different clients and attempts to bridge them.  Both invited clients
>> attempt to connect to each other simultaneously I guess, and both
>> think they
>> are in the controlling role.  Can this happen with Jingle?  Maybe it
>> can, but
>> it would be great if someone would say so.
> 
> I don't see what expressly forbids this. And even if it's not possible
> now, I don't see why we'd wish to preclude this happening in the future.

Well, Jingle doesn't cover third-party call control now. Someone would
need to define how that works. And it ain't me. :P

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/attachments/20091202/218b0a82/attachment.bin>