[Jingle] ICE-CONTROLLING / CONTROLLED
stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Dec 2 10:57:52 CST 2009
On 12/1/09 10:37 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Tue Dec 1 17:33:58 2009, Justin Karneges wrote:
>> The ICE draft says that conflict resolution is needed for third-party
>> control cases. Whenever I see stuff like "third-party call control",
>> my SIP
>> alarms go off, and I don't think it's wrong to ask for clarification
> Sure, but I'm not following the value in deviating from the standard
> spec here. Is this stuff particularly onerous?
>> Appendix B.11 describes a case where a call controller sends out
>> invites to
>> two different clients and attempts to bridge them. Both invited clients
>> attempt to connect to each other simultaneously I guess, and both
>> think they
>> are in the controlling role. Can this happen with Jingle? Maybe it
>> can, but
>> it would be great if someone would say so.
> I don't see what expressly forbids this. And even if it's not possible
> now, I don't see why we'd wish to preclude this happening in the future.
Well, Jingle doesn't cover third-party call control now. Someone would
need to define how that works. And it ain't me. :P
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Jingle