[Jingle] 1.1 XEPs (166, 167, 177)
stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Dec 2 12:22:03 CST 2009
On 12/2/09 10:39 AM, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 December 2009 09:01:05 Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 12/2/09 12:01 AM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>>> Makes sense. Anyone willing to take a stab at defining the contents of
>> My question is: do we need this for the 1.1 specs? The AVPF stuff seems
>> like a new feature that requires some further thought.
> Even if we don't put this in just yet, we still ought to get the current RTP
> profile stuff squared away in 1.1. That is, clarify that a content is only
> ever RTP/AVP or RTP/SAVP.
I think that RTP/AVP as the default was assumed back when we had the
profile attribute, and <encryption/> signals RTP/SAVP. But I'll add a
sentence to clarify that.
> (This is based on Paul Witty's mail, clarifying that RTP profiles are
> per-content and not per-component.)
> Later on we can add new protocol elements to indicate different profiles as
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Jingle