[Jingle] 1.1 XEPs (166, 167, 177)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Dec 2 12:22:03 CST 2009


On 12/2/09 10:39 AM, Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 December 2009 09:01:05 Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 12/2/09 12:01 AM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>>> Makes sense. Anyone willing to take a stab at defining the contents of
>>> <avpf>?
>> My question is: do we need this for the 1.1 specs? The AVPF stuff seems
>> like a new feature that requires some further thought.
> 
> Even if we don't put this in just yet, we still ought to get the current RTP 
> profile stuff squared away in 1.1.  That is, clarify that a content is only 
> ever RTP/AVP or RTP/SAVP.

I think that RTP/AVP as the default was assumed back when we had the
profile attribute, and <encryption/> signals RTP/SAVP. But I'll add a
sentence to clarify that.

> (This is based on Paul Witty's mail, clarifying that RTP profiles are 
> per-content and not per-component.)
> 
> Later on we can add new protocol elements to indicate different profiles as 
> necessary.

Agreed.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/attachments/20091202/9158b9cc/attachment.bin>


More information about the Jingle mailing list