[Jingle] do we need Raw UDP?

Olivier Crête olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
Mon May 18 14:04:40 CDT 2009


On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 12:59 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> The subject of this message says it all: do we really need Raw UDP, or
> is XEP-0177 useful only for bootstrapping and unit testing? Given that
> the Raw UDP candidate will be included in ICE negotiation anyway, I
> don't see much of a need for XEP-0177 at this point, so I'm wondering if
> perhaps we retract it and proceed only with XEP-0176 (ICE-UDP) as the
> preferred datagram transport.

I guess one argument for rawudp is integrating XMPP support into legacy
sip gateways without having to implement Full ICE there (since it XMPP
forbids ICE-lite).

-- 
Olivier Crête
olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/attachments/20090518/61c917e7/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Jingle mailing list