[Jingle] do we need Raw UDP?

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon May 18 17:07:57 CDT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 5/18/09 3:51 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> The handling of the media plane may be separate from the control plane,
> so there are reasons why ICE cannot be used even in a Jingle deployment.
> For example: the XMPP handler may direct clients to send media to an
> ICE-unaware media gateway or mixer.
> 
> I'd be fine with putting this on the back burner though until someone is
> actively using this though.

Personally I see no great harm in moving XEP-0177 to Draft, but perhaps
we need to add some further warning text there to the effect that you
really need to implement ICE if you expect NAT and firewall traversal.
There's text about that now but it's not very scary. :)

/psa

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkoR3D0ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vykZwCcCzi9gzqCyCGI/FQhwvFzG/Gn
hIkAoLTj9Ga3O9eKkF6O20JD0RU/enUG
=GIRH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Jingle mailing list