[Jingle] open issue: removing candidates
stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon May 18 18:02:45 CDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 5/18/09 4:32 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 5/18/09 12:55 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 5/13/09 10:11 PM, Justin Karneges wrote:
>>> Moving forward, I think one of two things should happen:
>>> 1) Remove the currently-documented transport-replace + generation attribute
>>> approach, so that ICE "restarting" is not possible at all in the context of
>>> 2) Document how to perform restarting clearly, be sure to call it "ICE
>>> restarts" for consistency with the ICE draft, and strongly consider using the
>>> ICE approach (change user/pass, rather than introducing a generation
>> I'd be OK with #1 for now, and if we find a legitimate use case for #2
>> when we can add it based on implementation and deployment experience
>> before XEP-0176 advances from Draft to Final.
> I chatted about this with Justin Uberti, who told me that Google Talk
> does #1 right now.
Sorry, I meant #2.
> So if possible I'd like to document that behavior in
> Jingle before we go to Draft. I'll work on that this evening and see how
> far I get.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Jingle