[Jingle] Call forking

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Oct 15 14:06:21 CDT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/15/09 12:45 PM, Florian Zeitz wrote:
> Justin Uberti wrote:
>> That's my opinion as well.
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im
>> <mailto:stpeter at stpeter.im>> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/15/09 12:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> On 10/15/09 11:56 AM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>>>> Are there any issues with <cancel/>? That seems like what we want
>> here.
> 
>>> +1
>> I mean, we can define a special reason for <session-accepted-elsewhere/>
>> or something like that if we really want to, but I don't really see the
>> need.
> 
>> Peter
> 
> <insert rant about evil top posters here />

Agreed. :)

> I personally think we want <alternative-session/> if we use anything
> that is already there.
> I think a reason of cancel would suggest that the caller was waiting to
> long and decided to hang up (i.e. it would log a missed call which we
> don't want to happen here).
> "The party prefers to use an existing session with the peer rather than
> initiate a new session" sounds pretty much like what's the case here...

That seems sensible. IIRC we thought that <alternative-session/> would
be used for communications between the same full JID pair ("hey, why are
you starting a new session, we've already got one!") but I suppose it
could be used for bare JID pairs as well ("hey, sorry about that, I'd
like to retract the offer because you answered from a different resource").

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrXcq0ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxA3gCfZ1BT9DLRWtS55SDzTqOBh/0y
YzQAoMVL8ABgjWoSbveAVUTuLRRbtopH
=Lge9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Jingle mailing list