[Jingle] [Fwd: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-tcp-08.txt]
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Oct 15 21:02:17 CDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/15/09 3:46 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> FYI. Feel free to speak up on the mmusic list if you care about ICE-TCP
>> (it might be useful for Jingle file transfer).
> IMHO XEP-0260 provides everything Jingle file transfer needs to get
> implemented. ICE-TCP may be a good future Jingle transport, but it is
> not needed.
Agreed. Nice but not necessary. Although for us to really have good file
transfer with XEP-0260 we need to deploy more S5B relays...
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Note: It has been reported that the simultaneous-open technique
>> has a low success rate (~40%) with the population of NAT devices
>> in use as of this writing.
> simultaneous-open is not supported by XEP-0260 and it looks like it does
> not really work anyway.
>> Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that implementations of this
>> specification acquire and use IPv6 host candidates. Means of
>> doing so across NATs include Tunnel Setup Protocol
>> [I-D.blanchet-v6ops-tunnelbroker-tsp], Teredo [RFC4380], IPSec
>> NAT-T [RFC3947], and others.
> XEP-0260 supports Teredo and IPv6 and even has IPv6 in an example.
How exactly does XEP-0260 support Teredo?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Jingle