[Jingle] Negotiating a RTP profile in XEP-0167

[Peter Saint-Andre]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/15/09 5:38 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
> 
> 
> 2009/10/15 Olivier Crête <olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk
> <mailto:olivier.crete at collabora.co.uk>>
> 
>     On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 14:17 -0700, Justin Uberti wrote:
>     >  So, how should one signal the use of a different profile, e.g.
>     > RTP/AVPF? Does a profile= attribute make sense here?
> 
>     Jingle already has a different way to signal SRTP instead of using
>     profiles. Maybe we want to do the same thing for AVPF? And we probably
>     want this to be in the caps so it can be discoverable. Also, with AVPF
>     we also want to signal the type of supported feedback with a=rtcp-fb. So
>     if we want to support it in jingle, I guess we can either add it to the
>     RTP xep or have another XEP to specify the XMPP way of getting that
>     information.
> 
> 
> Sure, although I don't want to have to invent something new every time a
> new profile is needed (don't forget SAVPF too!) 
> 
> Probably easiest to have it in a followup to XEP-0167. 
> 
> 
>     I'm not familiar with all the details of AVPF, but I believe that it is
>     mostly additive to AVP (ie, its mostly how RTCP is sent and processed).
> 
> 
> Yes, exactly. We use AVPF and only recently did we encounter a situation
> where there was an issue with specifying AVP instead of AVPF.

Do we need to bring back the 'profile' attribute in XEP-0167?

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrc1ZEACgkQNL8k5A2w/vx+kACgrgbZkh7FGk3tDVhn2Beg8X6q
z2IAni1bcIJoPSvwS5tj+xWX9u+j71S3
=5z/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----