[Jingle] "Future Jingle SIG" Formation
dave at cridland.net
Mon Jul 15 19:19:17 UTC 2013
Right, my travelling being over, let's use this as an agenda and meet
immediately after Council on Wednesday (so it should be around 1530 UTC).
Does that fit with the majority?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Philipp Hancke
<fippo at goodadvice.pages.de>wrote:
> Am 08.07.2013 21:09, schrieb Philipp Hancke:
> Am 01.07.2013 17:45, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>>> On 7/1/13 8:18 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Emil Ivov <emcho at jitsi.org
>>>> <mailto:emcho at jitsi.org>> wrote:
>>>> I won't be able to do neither Thursday nor Friday, but you can go
>>>> ahead without me.
>>>> Otherwise, I should be available early next week.
>>>> Early next week is fine for me as well, if that's easier for others...?
>>> Sounds good (I'll be offline on the 4th and 5th).
>> since i did not see anyone today i suppose it's tomorrow 15 UTC then?
>> I'll see if I can come up with some agenda bits...
> Didn't, but at least nobody else showed up :-)
> I'd summarize the current state of webrtc+jingle als follows:
> current state of webrtc
> - "brings p2p voice and video (and data!) to the open web platform"
> - "profile of "RAI 2.0" functionality, defining a core set of RTP
> functionality developed over the last decade (e.g. end-to-end
> security, adaptive HD codecs, AVPF, etc.)" (B. Aboba)
> - uses SDP as api (questioned at... w3c. or ietf. or both.)
> current state of jingle
> - jingle does xmlish sd, provides SDP mapping
> - works, but hasn't been updated since 2009, sdp has new features
> - jingle has been leading for features like trickle ice
> - requires presence. multi-device and forking not solved.
> - sox proposal.
> - state of the art media stack in the browser
> - and as opensource c++ lib (with java and objective c bindings)
> - webrtc.org solves a problem xmpp devs had with jingle in 2005
> Dave's email at http://mail.jabber.org/**pipermail/jingle/2013-June/**
> 001933.html<http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/2013-June/001933.html>describes the aim of the SIG quite well.
> Potential work items:
> - review of current jingle specs (I have a long list of bugs)
> - council (kev) wants input on sox
> - new sdp features (BUNDLE, a=ssrc)
> - sdp mapping in a single document / describe use of webrtc api for
> - multidevice / forking (using <message/>, carbons, pep) issue?
> - xep-0215 for turn?
> - file transfer over datachannels?
> - should we do dev advocacy?
> Anything I missed? Any disagreements?
> Who volunteers?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Jingle