[Jingle] "Future Jingle SIG" Formation

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Jul 17 18:01:07 UTC 2013

On 7/17/13 11:54 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> Am 16.07.2013 11:08, schrieb Andreas Kuckartz:
>> Philipp Hancke:
>>> - should we do dev advocacy?
>> What do you mean with that? Informing potential stakeholders?
> Yes. Two groups of stakeholders: a) web developers. xmpp provides
> quite a complete package for im/presence/chat (and signalling).
> Some web developers might be interested in having some of the hard
> issues (caps, pep, ...) solved for them instead of reinventing the
> wheel. Making it easy for them to use xmpp (by providing an easy
> to install package consisting of prosody, a turn server and
> something like strophe.jingle or stanza.io) might be worthwhile.
> b) the webrtc.org c++ lib provides a quite decent media stack 
> (cross-platform even). IMO, the lack of that was what prevented 
> libjingle adoption. The available information on how to use that
> stack is quite limited though. The team is busy enough with solving
> their own issues :-)

BTW we had a good meeting today. The logs are here:



Peter Saint-Andre

More information about the Jingle mailing list