[Jingle] Proposed message to send to the IETF rtcweb and W3C WebRTC working groups.
dave at cridland.net
Mon Jul 22 14:16:09 UTC 2013
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Ralph Meijer <ralphm at ik.nu> wrote:
> As discussed briefly in the "Future Jingle SIG" Formation thread, I
> suggested to send a message to the IETF rtcweb and W3C WebRTC working
> groups to inform their respective participants about the formation of the
> I drafted the following message. Comments welcome!
This looks overall excellent, and I've no blocking objections to it being
sent as-is. It's of a different character than I'd had in mind, which makes
it unsuited to use as the basis for a XEP, but this is fine. I've some
suggestions inline below.
> Hi all,
> I would like to inform you of the recent formation  of the Jingle
> Special Interest Group (SIG) at the XMPP Standards Foundation (XSF). The
> recent increase of activity in the WebRTC and rtcweb working groups and
> related high-profile product developments and announcements were reasons
> for the XMPP Council to decide to concentrate efforts around Jingle in a
> Jingle  is a general framework for managing media sessions between XMPP
> Sessions, including, but not limited to, audio/video streams, file transfer
> and application sharing. There are several documents describing
> applications of Jingle and the used transports, most linked from the
> overall framework specification .
> The specification of Jingle RTP Sessions , most relevant to these
> working groups, defines a Jingle application type for negotiating RTP
> sessions. It has been designed such that interoperability with SIP-based
> systems is possible. This includes mapping negotiation parameters to and
> from SDP, while remaining a signaling protocol in its own right (not mere
> SDP in angle brackets).
"merely", rather than "mere".
> The following work items were defined in the kick-off meeting last
> Wednesday, July 17 [5, raw log 6]:
> * Re-examining the state of the various Jingle proposals.
> * Polishing Jingle File Transfer.
> * Updating the SDP mapping in , including BUNDLE and Trickle-ICE
> * Documenting and communicating the value proposition of Jingle/XMPP.
> This SIG already includes a number of people participating in discussions
> on the WebRTC and rtcweb mailing lists and is lead by Dave Cridland
> (chair), Philipp Hancke, Lance Stout and myself. It is open to anyone, and
> we are looking forward to cooperate with the WebRTC and rtcweb working
> groups to improve both WebRTC and Jingle.
> The discussion venues are the Jingle mailing list  and the Jingle XMPP
> multi-user chat room . Our next meeting in the MUC room is Wednesday
> July 24 at 15:30 UTC and your participation would be highly appreciated.
>From "and your", perhaps: ". This groups's experience and input would be
highly appreciated, and your participation in both the meeting and the
on-going discussion would be most welcome."
> Ralph Meijer
>  <http://mail.jabber.org/**pipermail/jingle/2013-June/**001933.html<http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/2013-June/001933.html>
>  <http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/**technology-overview/jingle/<http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/technology-overview/jingle/>
>  <http://xmpp.org/extensions/**xep-0166.html<http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html>
>  <http://xmpp.org/extensions/**xep-0167.html<http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0167.html>
>  <http://mail.jabber.org/**pipermail/jingle/2013-July/**001956.html<http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/2013-July/001956.html>
>  <http://logs.xmpp.org/jingle/**130717/<http://logs.xmpp.org/jingle/130717/>
>  <http://mail.jabber.org/**mailman/listinfo/jingle<http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jingle>
>  <xmpp:jingle at muc.xmpp.org?join**>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Jingle