[Jingle] Proposed message to send to the IETF rtcweb and W3C WebRTC working groups.

Peter Thatcher pthatcher at google.com
Mon Jul 22 14:26:37 UTC 2013


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Philipp Hancke
<fippo at goodadvice.pages.de>wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Dele Olajide wrote:
>
>> I applaud the effort as well, but I hope it is not too late. I suppose
>> Google abandoning Jingle was a wake-up call (no pun intended).
>>
>
> Well, I recall a message to the rtcweb wg from someone who claimed to work
> a large jingle based system.


That would probably be me, and it's still large and still uses Jingle.


>
>
>  When I first proposed what has now been labelled SOX (SDP over XMPP) over
>> a year ago, as an extension to Jingle and even wrote a draft XEP, I was
>> shot down in flames. The point I made then is still valid right now. Jingle
>> did not make itself attractive to all the web developers looking for a
>> protocol back then to implement WebRTC signalling and most of them have
>> since adopted SIP over Websockets with JsSIP or did some custom SDP
>> invite/offer/answer/terminate signalling with JSON and NodeJs.
>>
>
> Right. Note that currently there's alot of discussion about SDP (and
> babies and bathwater) over at the w3c. Evaluation of things like sox or
> doing sdp-content inside jingle is still on the table if you want to
> discuss that.
>
>
>  Jingle is fast becoming irrelevant on a few WebRTC projects I have been
>> working on since. We now integrate WebRTC directly into the chat and
>> group-chat sessions. We have no need for another out-of context signalling
>> session. It also solves the issue of forking calls to multiple XMPP user
>> sessions. In fact, we are moving away from legacy telephone calls to
>> natural human audio and visual communication. As in "Sisko to O'Brien" from
>> the Star Trek DS9 TV show.
>>
>
> Right. This tight integration is one of the reasons why i'd like to
> evaluate using <message/> instead of <iq/>. If you already have an
> established chat session (a <thread/>) doing call-style ringing seems
> rather old-fashioned.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/attachments/20130722/3e48326e/attachment.html>


More information about the Jingle mailing list