[Jingle] <iq/> versus <message/> (Was: Tomorrow's meeting)

Emil Ivov emcho at jitsi.org
Wed Jul 24 12:37:55 UTC 2013

On 24.07.13, 13:23, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Let's try that again, with less fatfingering.
>   On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Emil Ivov <emcho at jitsi.org> wrote:
>> On 24.07.13, 12:22, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>> Right, and adoption is something we've got to work on.
>> Agreed and just deprecating all existing implementations with a wave of our
>> collective hand does not sound very much as nurturing adoption.
>   I don't think that adding the option of using messages instead of iqs
>   does this. I assume that we would add another disco for
> jingle-message, and that if both end points have this they'd use
> messages, otherwise iqs.

Which means that we are keeping IQs as MTI. Is this what you are saying?



More information about the Jingle mailing list