[Juser] jabberd on Linux

[Rene Bartosh]

Hello Mohd,

You would probably be better off asking this question on the "jadmin" list.

Being new to Linux - have you considered a system that will let you 
install a jabberd package without compiling it? Eg debian?

Regards,

Rene

P.S. Compose a new topic rather than replying to your welcome message 
please :) And change your password, it got sent to the whole list.

Mohd Idrees wrote:
> hello,
> iam currently working on the linux system
> iam a new guy for this system
> any way i tried to configure jabberd-1.4.3 on my system
> i had posed with this problem
> iam worried what to do
> pl help
> this is the error that iam getting while make the package
> 
> thanks in advance
> 
> 
> [root at dsl-tn-125 jabberd-1.4.3]# make
> Making all in pthsock
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/jabberd-1.4.3/pthsock'
> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/jabberd-1.4.3/pthsock'
> Making all in xdb_file
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/jabberd-1.4.3/xdb_file'
> gcc -g -Wall -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -fPIC -I../jabberd -shared
> -o xdb_file.so xdb_file.o -L/usr/local/lib  -lpth -lnsl  -ldl -lresolv
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/jabberd-1.4.3/xdb_file'
> Making all in dnsrv
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/jabberd-1.4.3/dnsrv'
> gcc -g -Wall -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -fPIC -I../jabberd/   -c -o
> dnsrv.o dnsrv.c
> dnsrv.c: In function `dnsrv_process_io':
> dnsrv.c:419: error: `PTH_ATTR_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function)
> dnsrv.c:419: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> dnsrv.c:419: error: for each function it appears in.)
> dnsrv.c: In function `dnsrv':
> dnsrv.c:533: error: `PTH_ATTR_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use in this function)
> make[1]: *** [dnsrv.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/jabberd-1.4.3/dnsrv'
> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:37:03 +0530, Mohd Idrees <maidrees at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>thanks