[Foundation] Jabber-RPC payload council question
Adam Theo
adamtheo at theoretic.com
Mon Sep 24 12:46:40 CDT 2001
>
> jer asked a good question on the JEP voting for Jabber-RPC
> this month. As I only have read-only access to the list ;-)
> I was wondering how to answer - but David Waite did the
> honours:
>
> http://mailman.jabber.org/pipermail/council/2001-September/000129.html
>
> Thanks David.
>
> For those interested / curious, the original question was
> valid, as we could have had something like this:
>
> <iq type='set' to='responder at company-a.com/jrpc-server' id='1'>
> <methodCall xmlns='jabber:iq:rpc'>
> <methodName>examples.getStateName</methodName>
> <params>
> <param>
> <value><i4>6</i4></value>
> </param>
> </params>
> </methodCall>
> </iq>
i just had an idea. sorry i didn't think of this while the development
was going on:
what about create a new root tag? after all, for RPC stuff, it obviously
isn't a 'message' (talk), and it really isn't an 'iq' (query). it's a
command. so i'd suggest:
<rpc type="xml-rpc|soap|...">
<methodCall>
...
</rpc>
or
<command type="xml-rpc|soap|...">
<methodCall>
...
</command>
More information about the Members
mailing list