[Foundation] Motion to propose JEP-0030 (Service Discovery) to council

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Mon Nov 25 15:13:29 CST 2002


I think the disco namespace in its current form, is much better than it used
to be (havent looked at it in ages) and it is now not really very far away
from what browse is anyway so am not sure what the fuss is about, I think
what this boils down to is that people are going to have to support two
different methods of browsing in their clients/servers/components but dont
want to have to.

Richard

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Millard" <me at pgmillard.com>
To: <members at jabber.org>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Foundation] Motion to propose JEP-0030 (Service Discovery)
to council


> So basically... here is the situation..
> The Browse JEP is _INFORMATIONAL_... it documents what already exists and
> what most implementations do.
>
> The Disco JEP is a STANDARDS TRACK JEP.. it fixes all of the problems that
> we agree are problems with browse. The reason it is a different namespace
is
> so that we don't have various flavors/versions of jabber:iq:browse. It
> should be _very_ simple/easy to implement both in most clients. Once Disco
> becomes draft, you should always try disco first, if that fails, try
> browsing.
>
> pgm.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
>




More information about the Members mailing list