[Foundation] membership, money, and meritocracy

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Wed Apr 2 02:54:08 CST 2003


> 5. All members must be actively affiliated with a company or an
> open-source project. If you like Jabber but don't contribute, we
> still love you but you can't be a member. If you once led a project
> but dropped out, you can't be a member. If your project is dead,
> you can't be a member. If you are a corporate member and your company
> goes out of business or fires you or whatever, you can't be a member
> (unless you meet the criteria in #4).
>
> As I said, this is controversial. I'm not wedded to everything I
> suggest above, but I *am* committed to making JSF membership an
> honor and a privilege. And I wouldn't mind raising a little money
> from corporate members of the Jabber community in the process.
>
> After we discuss this thoroughly, I will put together a more formal
> proposal (I hate to think what the Bylaws changes will look like).

What about protocol dev's?? Also this biases against a lot of people who
don't develop for linux, I would love to contribute to the server myself as
that's the area im interested in but I don't have the resources to run a
Linux machine to develop and test it, plus I don't like developing in C and
much prefer C++ but I think people would frown on starting a brand new
server project in C++.

Robert I haven't looked closely at the code but have you developed so that
it is portable? i.e. separated out all the OS dependant functions into
separate source files? If not then I suggest that this is something that is
very important to do, also I would be willing to work on win32 versions of
those files, the linux community is still a minority compared to windows and
if we can get the server running reliably on windows that will significantly
increase the potential user base.

Richard




More information about the Members mailing list