[Foundation] membership, money, and meritocracy

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Wed Apr 2 05:42:09 CST 2003

> ... (how we define "leader" and "active project" is open to debate, but
> checkins and release schedules, and maybe protocol compliance / JEP
> should help us create objective measures)
> Leader could be read as 'significant contributer'. This could also mean
> people who are actively involved in enhancing protocols by discussion on
> mailing lists, conference rooms or general wizardry, I think.

I think this is a much fairer way to define it, so people who generally help
out with various JEPs and are active but dont necessarily get acknowleged or
write their own JEPs are acknowleged as useful members and should not be
"kicked out".


More information about the Members mailing list