REFRESH: [Foundation] Motion to propose JEP-0065 (SOCKS5 Bytestreams) to Council

[Ben Schumacher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sorry. I hate to do this, but I feel like this motion may have been
missed in everybody's inbox as a result of the holiday break. We
currently have 2 seconds, is anybody else interested in seconding this
motion?

Cheers,

bs.

Ben Schumacher wrote:
| Please see above. Anybody who has been following the (rather
| controversial) discussions on the standards-jig mailing list probably
| already has a good grasp of the point of the JEP.
|
| Anybody care to second?
|
| Cheers,
|
| bs.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+FcrFUpoGqensAXIRAjhIAKCwR37k60CQgLFVwO9ghD1CPde+CwCfZWjS
MhKX3A8uKfOvVl4OhpU91/g=
=PtA8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----