[Foundation] Retraction: Call for Arbitration addition to the by-laws
Ryan Eatmon
reatmon at jabber.org
Tue Jul 1 18:56:48 CDT 2003
In speaking with Peter (again), he points out that this should probably
NOT be a by-law addition. But rather an addition to JEP #1.
Are there any objections to this proposal being added to JEP #1 and
being made part of the JEP process?
Robert Norris wrote:
>> In light of the current file transfer debate and request to the Council
>> for assitance, I would like to propose the following by-law addition to
>> clarify the Council's role. This proposal requires 5% of the JSF to
>> second it so that it can be voted on during the upcoming JSF Membership
>> meeting in August.
>
>I agree with this, and would second it, but I'm not sure how this text
>fits into the Bylaws (which make no mention of JEPs, for example).
>
>Can you clarify a bit? Is the text OK as it stands?
>
>Rob.
>
>
>
--
Ryan Eatmon reatmon at jabber.org
------------------------------------------------
Jabber.org - Perl Team jid:reatmon at jabber.org
More information about the Members
mailing list