[Foundation] Retraction: Call for Arbitration addition to the by-laws

Justin Karneges justin-jdev at affinix.com
Tue Jul 1 20:06:11 CDT 2003

On Tuesday 01 July 2003 05:18 pm, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> >>>>> "RE" == Ryan Eatmon <reatmon at jabber.org> writes:
>     RE> Are there any objections to this proposal being added to JEP
>     RE> #1 and being made part of the JEP process?
> What, is that all it takes?
> I don't object, I'm just a little shocked that things come and go like
> that.
> ~ESP

I think we still need the 5% seconds for it to happen, he was just making sure 
no one minded moving the changes into JEP 1 instead of the by-laws.


More information about the Members mailing list