[Foundation] Call for Arbitration addition to the by-laws
Russell Davis
rkdavis at burninghorse.com
Tue Jul 1 21:13:09 CDT 2003
+1 for the addition to jep-01 but pendulum arbitration or some other
form?
bst rgrds
Russell
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 18:29, Ryan Eatmon wrote:
> In light of the current file transfer debate and request to the Council
> for assitance, I would like to propose the following by-law addition to
> clarify the Council's role. This proposal requires 5% of the JSF to
> second it so that it can be voted on during the upcoming JSF Membership
> meeting in August.
>
>
> Call for Arbitration
>
> The Council, as an official body, shall have no sway over the direction
> of Jabber Enhancement Proposals (JEPs) until they are brought before the
> Council for a vote UNLESS a Call for Arbitration is made. Any member of
> the Foundation can, at any time, call for the Council to arbitrate a
> dispute amongst JEP authors over the direction that a single JEP, or a
> group of JEPs, should take. The call must be seconded by at least 5% of
> the full membership of the JSF and at least one of the authors of the
> disputed JEPs within 10 days of the call. The Council then has one week
> to review the situation and produce a ruling. The ruling shall be
> binding to all of the parties involved.
More information about the Members
mailing list