[Foundation] motions
Robert Norris
rob at cataclysm.cx
Wed Jun 11 21:25:11 CDT 2003
> I think it would be really useful for JSF members to vote +1 on a Last
> Call motion only if they intend to implement the protocol (either in an
> open-source project or in a commercial product). If the protocol needs
> to be implemented in both a server and a client, I think it would be
> best to require at least two server developers and at least three
> client developers to say that they plan to implement the protocol
> before going to Last Call (same for components). For client-only
> protocols (e.g., XHTML IM), we might require five client developers to
> say that they plan to implement.
Agreed.
> 1. Are there at least two server developers who will publicly state
> that they plan to implement "Flexible Offline Message Retrieval"
> as defined in JEP-0013? I know that there are representatives of
> the following server developers on this list:
>
> - jabberd project
I do intend to implement this JEP when/if it goes to draft, but I don't
think this can count as a formal second, because I motioned the Last
Call in the first place :)
Rob.
--
Robert Norris GPG: 1024D/FC18E6C2
Email+Jabber: rob at cataclysm.cx Web: http://cataclysm.cx/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20030612/bf9437da/attachment.pgp
More information about the Members
mailing list