[Foundation] finalists

chicago5 at gmx.de chicago5 at gmx.de
Fri Mar 7 02:33:31 CST 2003


i like the subset, it definitely splits wheat from whatever. 
As a finalist the only gallery i miss is album13, but i can live with that. 

My votes:
+3 for finalist #5
+3 for finalist #6
----------------------
+6 for the contest :)

- ulrich


> in an ideal world yes we should all beable to vote on all of them
> however this isn't an ideal world and in some ways it is better to have
> a subset of choices as then we more or less guarentee that no submission
> gets no votes, something i always dislike happening, just look at those
> poor countries who enter the eurovision song contest and get null points
> <said in a french accent> 
> 
> perhaps if stpeter adds my two requested options or even one of them
> then things will be a little better as you will have an option to either
> opt out of the decision or write in for one of the non choosen entries.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 03:05, Shawn Wilton wrote:
> > My apologies, not much was meant by the remark.  But I personally don't 
> > approve of people making choices for me.  If we're going to vote on 
> > logos, then shouldn't we be able to vote on all of them and not just a 
> > subset?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Justin Kirby wrote:
> > > /me thwaps Shawn Wilton with a very large wet trout
> > > 
> > > To even consider applying a derogatory remark to the people who have
> > > worked hard on this ... its uncalled for.
> > > 
> > > Use some discretion and withold pointless insults in the future. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Justin
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 02:42, Shawn Wilton wrote:
> > > 
> > >>I'll second that one.  I personally think that a lot of good logos
> were 
> > >>left out of the list in the first place.  Thanks to the drones for 
> > >>picking out the ones they like, but how about the rest of the
> community 
> > >>as well?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Russell Davis wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>I know marketing would really like to get this all cut and dried
> intime 
> > >>>to get the logo into the OSCON brochure but is this really something
> we
> > >>>want to hurry just for that? We have lived with the current graphic
> > >>>representations of the JSF for sometime  now and one brochure at one
> > >>>event even if it is OSCON isn't going to create an overnight
> > >>>"brandawareness" that is set in stone. So I suggest that we add one
> > >>>further option to memberbot, the option to say none of the above and
> > >>>lets come back to the logo issue in a couple of weeks after we have
> been
> > >>>fair and given all entrants a chance to revamp their entries as we
> > >>>originally planned to do.
> > >>>
> > >>>bst rgrds
> > >>>Russell Davis
> > >>>
> > >>>jid: ukscone at burninghorse.com
> > >>>email: ukscone at burninghorse.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>_______________________________________________
> > >>>Members mailing list
> > >>>Members at jabber.org
> > >>>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>Members mailing list
> > >>Members at jabber.org
> > >>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Members mailing list
> > > Members at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Members mailing list
> > Members at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
> Members at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members
> 

-- 
Ulrich Staudinger http://www.die-horde.de http://www.igpp.de 
Product Manager @ http://complat.sourceforge.net/jnlp/ 
JID: uls at jabber.org 




More information about the Members mailing list