[Members] s/JEP/XEP/g

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Mon Aug 21 11:52:18 CDT 2006


Ian Paterson wrote:
> The "Standards Track" label already differentiates those protocols that
> are likely to be of general use.
> 
>> I think we need 2 repositories. We could also move historical JEPs the
>> the
>> "2nd repository". The council could decide which protocol goes to which
>> repository.
>>
>> Otherwise we will end up with one big unmanageable repository of 500+
>> JEP's
>> soon. And i don't think this is what we want.
> 
> There are thousands of RFCs.
> 
> IMHO we don't need multiple repositories, we just need intelligent
> categories that enable developers to browse for what they need (you
> could think of each value of each category as defining a
> sub-repository). One important advantage of this approach is you don't
> end up having to search multiple repositories whenever you're not sure
> which repository might contain the protocol.

Or a wizard. "What kind of problem are you trying to solve?" "I want
something like IRC channels but over Jabber, er, XMPP." "Oh, you want to
read XEP-0045."

/psa


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20060821/e27763ae/smime.bin


More information about the Members mailing list