stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Aug 31 10:19:41 CDT 2006
Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2006, at 10:27, Remko Troncon wrote:
>>> Feedback is welcome as always.
>> I would like to see 'reliable communication' on that roadmap as well.
>> It's pretty strange that the only network i know of that provides
>> reliable IM, Skype, is one that wasn't even designed for IM. I have
>> seen (non-technical) people actually resorting to that network if they
>> needed reliable IM.
> Reliable IM is still the biggest issue xmpp faces, imo, and one I
> desperately want to see addressed in the next year.
> I'm a bit curious about how one provides incentives to clients to
> support things like sasl, tls etc; surely all clients are already pretty
> motivated to support the base spec (whether they support it or not, I'd
> guess supporting the spec is a fairly big incentive), but I guess I'll
> have to be patient and see.
It's possible that we may offer bounties for spec compliance by a
certain date or whatever, but that is still to be discussed and
determined. It depends somewhat on the trust proposal I sent around a
few months ago, which I'm in the process of revising.
Jabber Software Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20060831/7294f3bd/smime.bin
More information about the Members