ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk
Tue Nov 14 03:57:52 CST 2006
Matt Tucker wrote:
> I think that "Forum" is a bit weak sounding. Given a choice, I'd be more
> inclined to accept standards from a "foundation" rather than a "forum".
> There's little chance we won't be perceived as open given our history.
> :) I'd also argue that "foundation" has a more non-profit/open source
> feel, which is more in tune with the character of the community than the
> more commercial-sounding "forum". That along with differentiation from
> SIP Forum makes me +1 on Foundation.
That's a very good summary of the points that, I agree, swing it for
More information about the Members