[Members] voting update #1

[Ulrich Staudinger]

I wish ya all the best of luck ;-)

Tobias Markmann schrieb:

> Nice idea.  But that would require ad-hoc support too and that isn't 
> really common. Okay, some may support in but not full.
>
> On 9/10/06, *Alexander Gnauck* <gnauck at ag-software.de 
> <mailto:gnauck at ag-software.de>> wrote:
>
>     Before you vote for Boad and Council you should first read the
>     Wiki pages
>     with all applications and make your decicions. Then the order in which
>     memberbot shows the applicants doesnt matter. This is at least
>     what I am
>     doing normally. This year we have 8 great applicants for the
>     council which
>     doesnt make the voting easier this year.
>
>     If we decide to rewrite memberbot I propose to use xData. There
>     should be
>     enough clients today with xData support. A small wizard with
>     Ad-Hoc-Commands
>     would also be pretty cool.
>
>     Alex
>
>
>     > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>     > Von: members-bounces at jabber.org <mailto:members-bounces at jabber.org>
>     > [mailto:members-bounces at jabber.org
>     <mailto:members-bounces at jabber.org>] Im Auftrag von Remko Troncon
>     > Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. September 2006 15:27
>     > An: JSF members discussion list
>     > Betreff: Re: [Members] voting update #1
>     >
>     >
>     > > Solutions, in order of difficulty:
>     >
>     > Out of curiosity, what happens when a person votes on the
>     > first 5 candidates ? Will he still get to see the last two
>     > candidates (with an error message if he says 'yes'), or will
>     > he never know there were more than 5 candidates ? I also
>     > think the last candidates don't stand much chance, unless
>     > they're called stpeter ;-)
>     >
>     > The easiest fair solution I think would be to present an
>     > enumeration of all the candidates with their corresponding
>     > application URL, ask the user to enter 5 numbers of the list,
>     > present the names of the 5 selected people, and ask for
>     > confirmation of the list.
>     >
>     > cheers,
>     > Remko
>     >
>
>