[Members] XSF membership: what does it mean?

Jonathan Schleifer js-xmpp-members at webkeks.org
Wed Nov 5 11:33:48 CST 2008

I agree that having someone to look over it isn't bad. But I think  
there should also be a WG which does the main work on the XEP, and  
then the Council only has a quick view on it.

Am 05.11.2008 um 18:22 schrieb Dave Cridland:

> This isn't limited to specifications which are under active  
> scrutiny, too - we've a lot of specs, some of them largely untouched  
> for years, and updating or polishing those is a mammoth task.

That's just another thing I don't like: Why is an untouched XEP bad?  
It isn't necessarily bad, so why automatically regard it as deferred?  
Maybe it's just not used yet? And deferrig it definitely won't change  


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20081105/659e782c/attachment-0001.pgp 

More information about the Members mailing list