[Members] order of candidates

Brendan Taylor whateley at gmail.com
Tue Sep 2 18:34:14 CDT 2008

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 02:53:08PM -0700, Matt Tucker wrote:
> There is actual value to seniority after all. :)

Sure, but that value should presumably be assessed by the voters. Making
the most senior people first on the list (or last, for that matter) just
seems to invite laziness and stagnation.

If this is really an issue then randomly ordered would be best. I don't
know how feasible that is.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20080902/65337183/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Members mailing list