[Members] order of candidates

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Jack Moffitt wrote:
>> If this is really an issue then randomly ordered would be best. I don't
>> know how feasible that is.
> 
> A random order is probably fairest.  Can it be random for each voter,
> or must an ordering be applied before the voting starts?

Until someone rewrites memberbot or designs a new voting system, the 
ordering must be applied before the voting starts. Given that 
constraint, I'm trying to find something fairer than alphabetical order. 
Yielding priority to those who are lesser known (roughly measured by 
time in the community) seems like the best we can do at the moment.

/psa

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20080902/44502247/attachment.bin