[Members] order of candidates
melo at simplicidade.org
Wed Sep 3 04:25:32 CDT 2008
On Sep 3, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Jack Moffitt wrote:
>>> If this is really an issue then randomly ordered would be best. I
>>> know how feasible that is.
>> A random order is probably fairest. Can it be random for each voter,
>> or must an ordering be applied before the voting starts?
> Until someone rewrites memberbot
Out of curiosity, is there an online repository for the memberbot we
> or designs a new voting system, the ordering must be applied before
> the voting starts. Given that constraint, I'm trying to find
> something fairer than alphabetical order. Yielding priority to those
> who are lesser known (roughly measured by time in the community)
> seems like the best we can do at the moment.
I still think random is the fair choice, but given that I actually
read the applicants proposals and try to get to know their work, the
order is really not that relevant to me :)
XMPP ID: melo at simplicidade.org
More information about the Members