[Members] OFFICIAL MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Tue May 5 04:49:29 CDT 2009


On Sat May  2 14:35:16 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> We could do preference order or something like that. But, truly, XSF
> membership is so meaningless that I don't think it's worth the  
> effort to
> tweak the voting system. ;-)

If you were to do voting system tweaks, then range voting is the  
sensible option, since unlike preference ordering, it defeats Arrow's  
theorum, from what I recall. (In particular, it eliminates tactical  
voting).

I'd certainly support a review of voting systems, and I'd also be  
keen to see the same voting system for all elections.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade


More information about the Members mailing list