[Members] minutes of XSF Annual Meeting, 2009-10-06

Fabio Forno fabio at bluendo.com
Wed Oct 7 03:26:05 CDT 2009


2009/10/7 Mickaël Rémond <mickael.remond at process-one.net>:

> However, I feel that the XSF should go toward a more neutral, more open and
> more professional approach of the organisation. Keeping the organisation
> this way in an informal mode made some bug organisation (some of them being
> customers so I am aware of it) reluctant to invest into XMPP. They have no
> clear way to have good technical members, that are just professional but not
> XMPP enthousiasts to participate. It means that we lose lots of value and
> feedback from good professionals. My view is that protocol management is the
> weak point of XMPP and is what could finally turn out companies from using
> it.

Could you explain better please? I don't get why just "enthusiasts"
can participate, since all the activities are open, while it is
obvious that for decision taking roles a minimum commitment is
required.

-- 
Fabio Forno,
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: ff at jabber.bluendo.com


More information about the Members mailing list